We got wind today CONMAN Mark Reyland sent out some BS cease and desist emails to a few people. Really does this MORON think people telling the truth about him gives the right for cease and desist. That's funny as hell.
The CONMAN keeps indicating his family is getting stalked. Well that's all BS or he could prove it he's been asked in the past.NO PROOF. He's yet to provide any proof because there is NONE. His family didn't rip off a woman's Invention. He did it on his own.
http://adealwithmarkreyland.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=3
This asshole has had fake profiles for years especially when he played Johnny Gee on Edison Nation and the members caught him with his knickers down. He thinks because it was a couple years ago it was OK,well its not.
http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/why-not-have-an-expert
Mark Reyland your conman ways are coming to an end. Stick your cease and desist where the sun don't shine buddy.In your dark basement office.
By the way couldn't you find a better cease and desist letter. You dumb ass had to copy it from the link below.
http://www.opusdeialert.com/ceast.htm
WHAT A MORON!
Showing posts with label United Inventor's association Assets.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Inventor's association Assets.. Show all posts
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
Sunday, 27 May 2012
Inventor Roger Brown Looks like a FOOL Once AGAIN
John Young really Slapped Mr Brown again.
What exactly does your statement below mean?
"I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
A Civil Litigation,,,,really Roger. How could that be Mr Brown? Im sure you can re-site the American Inventors Protection Act word for word since you post it all over different forums and have wrote articles about Inventor Submission Companys. If you think the Company's that wanted to help John for MONEY have any recoarse against him it pretty much proves you dont understand the rules of the Protection Act.
Once the Company's sent John the contract to sign they need to give there success rate.....That wasnt done by any of them. Chris Hawker from Trident Design was the only one that stepped up to the plate and didnt throw a curve ball to the Inventor......
Hats off to Chris and his firm "Trident Design" !
Roger Brown • As I said before "I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
What is hard to understand about that? Is my answer the answer you want NO. Does it have to be the answer you want NO. I prefer to let the situation work its self out without my involvement. You may like spending your time in court, I have better things to do with my time. I do appreciate you giving my answering so much weight.
Were sure Roger Brown's creating damage for Edison Nation/Enventys Business Model now that he's on their team.
inventorspotforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=4311&start=50Cached
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Scammer-caught-his-pants-down-4272143.S.107404200
We could have copied more but to be honest, it
was becoming painful to read the rant falling off the tips of inventor, Roger
Brown’s fingers. He was fully intending to create trouble and fighting in
threads. Maybe he’s having ANOTHER bad day?
The important part below is this: Roger Brown
claims he is not a staff member of the UIA and even insinuated John Young
created a fake email to imply Brown had such an email account.
Maybe he didn’t think John would pull the move
he did. Anyone is welcome to email John and ask for Roger Brown’s UIA sent
email. We never thought Roger was as sly as Reyland but here we have it shining
through. Reyland must finally be proud to call Roger `friend` opposed to the
other more flavorable names Mark Reyland has been quoted calling Roger Brown.
Nice
that Roger is slapping the words all over, given to him by Mark Reyland, that
companies are about to sue John Young. Good move guys.
You told the wrong man Reyland...dribble... dribble ...dribble...his ego is as
big as yours and his constant NEED to show he has inside information is a
burden for him to hold.
Were betting Roger has no place to hide now that Reyland left him in the sand box with the Pitt Bulls. He needs to watch where he steps in the sand,those arent Baby Ruth Bars or Cigars laying around. NEED A LIGHT ROGER?
Roger Brown • Actually John I was responding to your
responses. I can't help you had trouble answering. And it was you who took it
in another direction not me. That was your fault not mine. No, I am not a UIA Staff member.
I have answered questions on licensing for them so have others that have experience
in diferent fields. There are some patent attorneys that respond to those types
of questions as they have time. I also am a moderator and contributer for
Inventorspot.com,answer a number of questions here on Linkedin and a number of
different blogs, I answer questions on a number of forums and write articles
for blogs, Inventor's Digest magazine and do speaking engagements on inventing
and licensing. I have never denied doing any of those. It is you and your
buddies that try and make something sinister out of it.
Your turn Troy , are you doing the patent searches for John's company? Will you be listed on their ewebsite showing your credentials?
Your turn Troy , are you doing the patent searches for John's company? Will you be listed on their ewebsite showing your credentials?
Then Gizmo turns Roger upside down with his Edible Sneakers concept. Roger ran like a scared pussy cat and never answered.
Troy Robison • Roger,What exactly does your statement below mean?
"I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
A Civil Litigation,,,,really Roger. How could that be Mr Brown? Im sure you can re-site the American Inventors Protection Act word for word since you post it all over different forums and have wrote articles about Inventor Submission Companys. If you think the Company's that wanted to help John for MONEY have any recoarse against him it pretty much proves you dont understand the rules of the Protection Act.
Once the Company's sent John the contract to sign they need to give there success rate.....That wasnt done by any of them. Chris Hawker from Trident Design was the only one that stepped up to the plate and didnt throw a curve ball to the Inventor......
Hats off to Chris and his firm "Trident Design" !
Roger Brown • As I said before "I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
What is hard to understand about that? Is my answer the answer you want NO. Does it have to be the answer you want NO. I prefer to let the situation work its self out without my involvement. You may like spending your time in court, I have better things to do with my time. I do appreciate you giving my answering so much weight.
Troy Robison • Roger,You dont need to get involved with John's issue.
Lets look at it this way. If another Inventor invented an Edible Pair of Sneaker's out of Fruit RollUps and the lace eyelets dissolved in your mouth not the shoes or your hands and tasted like M&M'S ,Would it be ok for A,B,C or D, Inventor Submission Companys to tell the Inventor they have a good idea with their sneakers.Then they send the Inventor a contract to sign asking for money. Do they need to supply their success rate with the contract. Keep in mind once they send the contract their asking the inventor to sign a legal document.
At that point wouldnt the American Inventors Protection Act FEDERAL RULES kick in? Since you love to recite the act and rules this should be an easy question for you to answer. If your alittle rusty remembering how the act reads Google it then come back and answer.
Both of us know the Sneakers would never fly in retail and make the inventor any money. Dont We.......With that being said what are your thoughts?
Roger the info below was written by you roughly one yr ago........Do you have a change of Heart these days......
Look at what these companies are REQUIRED to share with you (IN WRITING) BEFORE you spend money with them. If they change the subject or try and not give you what is REQUIRED by LAW, WHY WOULD YOU USE THEM? It’s YOUR money you are wasting by not doing a little research.
The AIPA requires invention promoters (i.e., those who provide “invention promotion services”) to disclose a number of things in writing, prior to entering into a contract for invention promotion services. These are:
(1) the total number of inventions evaluated by the invention promoter for commercial potential in the past 5 years, as well as the number of those inventions that received positive evaluations, and the number of those inventions that received negative evaluations;
(2) the total number of customers who have contracted with the invention promoter in the past 5 years, not including customers who have purchased trade show services, research, advertising, or other nonmarketing services from the invention promoter, or who have defaulted in their payment to the invention promoter;
(3) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received a net financial profit as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter;
(4) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received license agreements for their inventions as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter; and
(5) the names and addresses of all previous invention promotion companies with which the invention promoter or its officers have collectively or individually been affiliated in the previous 10 years.
http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/giving-up-on-entrepeneurship
Lets look at it this way. If another Inventor invented an Edible Pair of Sneaker's out of Fruit RollUps and the lace eyelets dissolved in your mouth not the shoes or your hands and tasted like M&M'S ,Would it be ok for A,B,C or D, Inventor Submission Companys to tell the Inventor they have a good idea with their sneakers.Then they send the Inventor a contract to sign asking for money. Do they need to supply their success rate with the contract. Keep in mind once they send the contract their asking the inventor to sign a legal document.
At that point wouldnt the American Inventors Protection Act FEDERAL RULES kick in? Since you love to recite the act and rules this should be an easy question for you to answer. If your alittle rusty remembering how the act reads Google it then come back and answer.
Both of us know the Sneakers would never fly in retail and make the inventor any money. Dont We.......With that being said what are your thoughts?
Roger the info below was written by you roughly one yr ago........Do you have a change of Heart these days......
Look at what these companies are REQUIRED to share with you (IN WRITING) BEFORE you spend money with them. If they change the subject or try and not give you what is REQUIRED by LAW, WHY WOULD YOU USE THEM? It’s YOUR money you are wasting by not doing a little research.
The AIPA requires invention promoters (i.e., those who provide “invention promotion services”) to disclose a number of things in writing, prior to entering into a contract for invention promotion services. These are:
(1) the total number of inventions evaluated by the invention promoter for commercial potential in the past 5 years, as well as the number of those inventions that received positive evaluations, and the number of those inventions that received negative evaluations;
(2) the total number of customers who have contracted with the invention promoter in the past 5 years, not including customers who have purchased trade show services, research, advertising, or other nonmarketing services from the invention promoter, or who have defaulted in their payment to the invention promoter;
(3) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received a net financial profit as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter;
(4) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received license agreements for their inventions as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter; and
(5) the names and addresses of all previous invention promotion companies with which the invention promoter or its officers have collectively or individually been affiliated in the previous 10 years.
http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/giving-up-on-entrepeneurship
Were sure Roger Brown's creating damage for Edison Nation/Enventys Business Model now that he's on their team.
inventorspotforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=4311&start=50Cached
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Scammer-caught-his-pants-down-4272143.S.107404200
Thursday, 17 May 2012
Would YOU Donate to IP Theives?
The United Inventor's Association blog (AKA Mark Reyland, AKA Johnny Franklin, AKA Johnny Gee AKA too many to list both male and female) asks for donations.
How
becoming of an organization to post the picture of a small child and then beg
for money so Mark Reyland, who has been proven time and time again NOT
to have any successful products can educate you by travelling around on your dime, managing to escape his dark basement office corner. Donate to him so he can recite
some teaching from books, blogs and Internet sites he's read from. The very same things you
can find for yourself. We all know he can’t teach from experience.
Raise money for Mark Reyland so you too can have your
invention stolen and placed publicly as a UIA (United Inventor's Association) asset! HUH? Wait a minute! The funny part is it
STILL has the inventor’s name on it!
1. [PDF]
We can see more...here www.adealwithmarkreyland.blogspot.com
Scroll down on this blog and you can hear from Mark Reyland's own lawyer how Reyland has no rights to it. We also read he has fundageek listed as a UIA asset. Does
Fundageek know this or was this planned all along?
Why is the UIA acquiring assets from inventors without the inventors’
knowledge or permission?
Has Mark Reyland turned the UIA into IP thieves?
We’ll find out.
Until then...would you donate money to IP thieves? Until we
see this addressed, EVERY single board member needs to take responsibility for
Mark Reyland stealing inventions and listing them as “owned” by the United
Inventor’s Association!
He always did have a plan to take down the UIA. Maybe he had plans to take it down from the inside?
The information against Mark Reyland is staggering!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
I'm faking that email Huh, if you are saying that, I'm publicly calling you a liar. And will prove the email is real by forwarding it to anyone that wants to see proof that you are a LIAR and not to be trusted.
IF you are saying that I faked that email, you have just been caught in a lie to these inventors.
If anyone would like to see proof that Roger Brown is lying about being a UIA staff member, email me at tandjyoung@att.net and I will forwarded you the email as proof of my claims.
Also Roger stands beside the UIA and what these companies tried to do to the stick invention, All I had to do was sign the contract and pay,and I was riped off by UIA accredited medallion member companies. The same UIA that is supposed to be looking out for the inventors wanted to take my money for a stupid invention just as the other rip off companies did.
If these companies are going to sue me for what they did, that was totally unethical. You don't have to worry. Let me worry and you can answer the question.
THE question is, what do YOU think of what the UIA companies tried to do, they wanted to take money from an inventor with absolutely no chance of getting to market ?
Was it the correct think to do, yes or no?
Do you approve of them doing this , yes or no ?
If you don't answer this, then its obvious that you don't want to say how you feel about it, because it will go badly for them. Or you approve of what and how they did it and you could careless about the inventors and wont answer because you don't want them angry with you because you stand with them.
Answer it for all to see how you really feel and who you really are. Don't worry about a law suite because your answer wont be used in court, its an opinion and not relevant to any law suite, so don't use that as an excuse.
Get ready everyone the dancing clown show will now begin. Because he WILL NOT answer the question !