Check the youtube video out below. It reminds us of United Inventors Association Executive Director Mark T. Reyland. Reyland. He post all over the internet he has a product development company with many patents in his name. He claims to be an expert in the Inventor Industry without showing any proof.
After watching the video see if it reminds you of Reyland the CONMAN. In time CONMEN all screw up and get caught. Look at the CONMAN act by Timothy Poe the stuttering “America’s Got Talent” contestant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiItdgDxfMs
Tim Poe, the stuttering “America’s Got Talent” contestant who won over the crowd and judges with his moving story of turning to music after almost being killed by a grenade in Afghanistan in 2009, has some serious explaining to do.
VIDEO BELOW
Earlier this week, it was revealed that the soldier in the Army portrait he provided to the show was not actually him, and then the Minnesota National Guard said it could not substantiate his claims about being injured in the war.
Now, Poe is apologizing for passing off U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Norman Bone’s photo in combat as his own, claiming he never meant to mislead the public for his own personal gain.
In an interview with the New York Post, the aspiring singer admits that his war injury “may not have happened exactly like I said it did,” claiming, “I really do not remember a lot of things since the accident. I remember a blast going off by my head and being in Afghanistan and telling one of the sergeants.”
Poe also admits to lying about never singing prior to his supposed accident (he had told judges he turned to performing as a way to cure his brain injury-induced stammer).
“I was in a band,” he confesses. “But it was before the accident. And at the time of ‘AGT,’ when the judges asked, before I could even think about answering, my words had already came out.”
But that’s not the end of it.
Poe ALSO admits to lying about being awarded the Purple Heart for his military service.
Check out video of his “AGT” performance below.
What do you make of Poe and his story — Do you believe some of it, or think he’s a total fraud?
And should he be kicked off for lying — or kept because of his talent?
http://www.gossipcop.com/tim-poe-lied-war-apology-americas-got-talent-contestant-lying-agt-lies-stutter-injured-army-veteran/
Warren Tuttle UIA President has to be stupid if he thinks all of the accomplishments on the CONMAN Reyland's resume is real.
Showing posts with label Metro Tango. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Metro Tango. Show all posts
Saturday, 6 July 2013
Monday, 24 December 2012
Mark Reyland's Headstone Reads "CONMANS FAKE RESUME"
Wow this Circus Clown "Mark Reyland sure is proud of himself.
When I’ve lived my life, said my piece, and made my mark on the world – I hope to look back on all that was written about me and be proudest of the three simple words etched in my headstone – He was kind
Since he didnt finish the rest of the sentence we will.
When I’ve lived my life, said my piece, and made my mark on the world – I hope to look back on all that was written about me and be proudest of the three simple words etched in my headstone – He was kind ..... CONMANS FAKE RESUME
Sunday, 22 July 2012
Mark Reyland's ready to EXPLODE.
Gizmo calls Reyland out again. Will he dare come out of his dark basement office to defend his turf? Who knows Inventor ROGER BROWN may show up to help is CONMAN BUDDY.
@ Mick, Heres the problem with the UIA. They want to be recognized as the Ultimate NON-FOR-PROFIT Organization out to help inventors. If thats the case why did they not publish all the info that happened between inventor inventor Steven Brown and AbsolutleyNew the invention submission company.
Bill Freund is the VP Marketing/Business Development for AbsolutleyNew. He was also a UIA board member at the time when all this crap went on. Then Reyland makes stupid comments “AbsolutelyNew is no longer with the UIA and as is customary with the UIA, we don’t comment on non-UIA members".
Why in the world should anyone TRUST this organization after that STUPID comment. Does this look like an organization that can be trusted.....heck no its BS. This reminds me of all the clowns in the White House. When one of them get caught with there pants down its swept under the rug. That's what happened in Browns situation.
______________________________________________________________________
"UIA Executive Director Mark Reyland was mum on AbsolutelyNew’s departure from the UIA and Freund stepping down as a UIA board member".
“AbsolutelyNew is no longer with the UIA and as is customary with the UIA, we don’t comment on non-UIA members,” Reyland says. “They chose not to renew their membership after lengthy discussions between their management and the UIA board. Lengthy discussions.
______________________________________________________________________http://www.inventorsdigest.com/archives/7525
______________________________________________________________________
Lets look at who else from AbsolutleyNew is sitting in the drivers seat. Oh look its John Dudas the former USPTO Director. Does anyone see the clear conflict of interest with Dudas?
Then Bonnie Kaake the former UIA Executive Director makes the statement below that the past UIA Director Patrick Raymond was on the $$$$$ take from AbNew. Why wasn't that info publically anounced when it happened? Actually when Reyland took over Raymond was put into the UIA position as treasurer. Know someone else is the treasurer,,,what happened to Patrick? Did he get caught with his hand in the cookie jar like Bonnie indicated with AbNew?
_____________________________________________________________________
'Just a quick note: Patrick Raymond was the executive director at the time and was directly responsible for the certification of AbNew. Many board members were against it, including me. Raymond can be overpowering and manipulative of less confident people. Later, it was discovered that he was getting paid by AbNew, a clear conflict of interest.
Mark Reyland is doing a wonderful job of taking UIA to the next level as an educational national organization for inventors. He is doing the job Raymond was supposed to be doing for inventors. Raymond was looking out for himself.'
______________________________________________________________________
Why should anyone trust the UIA? Reyland claims to be a successful product developer with many products in retail. He has been questioned many many times to prove his claims and never has. He wants to whoever questions him to call him on the phone to discuss his many products in retail. Then the BS starts coming out of his mouth. The problem is the person he talked to researches the info he gave them without any success. Then Reyland gets questioned again about his products,that's when he starts calling the person a STALKER.
Watch the video below, it reminds me of the UIA/Reyland situation.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikaajbOEWpk
The big question here is why didn't the UIA investigate Reyland's successful claims before they tossed inventors to the dogs.. If you go to the UIA board members listed some of there Board seat term dates have ran out. President Warren Tuttle's term ran out in 2011. Steve Greenburgs ran out in 2011 also. Whats up with that.
@ Mick, Heres the problem with the UIA. They want to be recognized as the Ultimate NON-FOR-PROFIT Organization out to help inventors. If thats the case why did they not publish all the info that happened between inventor inventor Steven Brown and AbsolutleyNew the invention submission company.
Bill Freund is the VP Marketing/Business Development for AbsolutleyNew. He was also a UIA board member at the time when all this crap went on. Then Reyland makes stupid comments “AbsolutelyNew is no longer with the UIA and as is customary with the UIA, we don’t comment on non-UIA members".
Why in the world should anyone TRUST this organization after that STUPID comment. Does this look like an organization that can be trusted.....heck no its BS. This reminds me of all the clowns in the White House. When one of them get caught with there pants down its swept under the rug. That's what happened in Browns situation.
______________________________________________________________________
"UIA Executive Director Mark Reyland was mum on AbsolutelyNew’s departure from the UIA and Freund stepping down as a UIA board member".
“AbsolutelyNew is no longer with the UIA and as is customary with the UIA, we don’t comment on non-UIA members,” Reyland says. “They chose not to renew their membership after lengthy discussions between their management and the UIA board. Lengthy discussions.
______________________________________________________________________http://www.inventorsdigest.com/archives/7525
______________________________________________________________________
Lets look at who else from AbsolutleyNew is sitting in the drivers seat. Oh look its John Dudas the former USPTO Director. Does anyone see the clear conflict of interest with Dudas?
Then Bonnie Kaake the former UIA Executive Director makes the statement below that the past UIA Director Patrick Raymond was on the $$$$$ take from AbNew. Why wasn't that info publically anounced when it happened? Actually when Reyland took over Raymond was put into the UIA position as treasurer. Know someone else is the treasurer,,,what happened to Patrick? Did he get caught with his hand in the cookie jar like Bonnie indicated with AbNew?
_____________________________________________________________________
'Just a quick note: Patrick Raymond was the executive director at the time and was directly responsible for the certification of AbNew. Many board members were against it, including me. Raymond can be overpowering and manipulative of less confident people. Later, it was discovered that he was getting paid by AbNew, a clear conflict of interest.
Mark Reyland is doing a wonderful job of taking UIA to the next level as an educational national organization for inventors. He is doing the job Raymond was supposed to be doing for inventors. Raymond was looking out for himself.'
______________________________________________________________________
Why should anyone trust the UIA? Reyland claims to be a successful product developer with many products in retail. He has been questioned many many times to prove his claims and never has. He wants to whoever questions him to call him on the phone to discuss his many products in retail. Then the BS starts coming out of his mouth. The problem is the person he talked to researches the info he gave them without any success. Then Reyland gets questioned again about his products,that's when he starts calling the person a STALKER.
Watch the video below, it reminds me of the UIA/Reyland situation.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikaajbOEWpk
The big question here is why didn't the UIA investigate Reyland's successful claims before they tossed inventors to the dogs.. If you go to the UIA board members listed some of there Board seat term dates have ran out. President Warren Tuttle's term ran out in 2011. Steve Greenburgs ran out in 2011 also. Whats up with that.
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
Written for Inventor Roger Brown and Mark Reyland UIAUSA
I swear I am clever
I'll always deceive
lies and more lies
I don't plan to leave
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I like to be right
and must always be so
Don't do as I say
and my anger will grow
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I rant and I rave
always looking the fool
You're making me mad
publicly losing my cool
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
When I can't get my way
I create a new name
Johnny Franklin's my latest
I'm a troll with a game
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I will lie and will cheat
to get what I want
They're seeing through us
so through emails we'll taunt
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
away from the forums
away from the chats
we're nothing but Conmen
we're nothing but rats.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
-anonymous
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
Protecting Your Inventions From The CONMEN 101
Research is the KEY in the Inventor Industry. Read all the info below if you want protection on your Invention.
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2011/09/will-real-mark-reyland-please-stand-up.html
http://www.abettermousetrap.co.uk/2012/01/knives-out-for-us-inventor-service-company-ceo/
http://markreyland.com/
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2012/04/mark-reyland-lies-about-military.html
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2012/05/uia-mark-reyland-vandal.html
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2012/02/little-look-back.html
http://adealwithmarkreyland.blogspot.com/
BEWARE OF THIS CONMAN HE HAS MANY FACES
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2011/09/will-real-mark-reyland-please-stand-up.html
http://www.abettermousetrap.co.uk/2012/01/knives-out-for-us-inventor-service-company-ceo/
http://markreyland.com/
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2012/04/mark-reyland-lies-about-military.html
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2012/05/uia-mark-reyland-vandal.html
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2012/02/little-look-back.html
http://adealwithmarkreyland.blogspot.com/
   Wink Mark T Reyland | |
Sunday, 27 May 2012
Inventor Roger Brown Looks like a FOOL Once AGAIN
John Young really Slapped Mr Brown again.
What exactly does your statement below mean?
"I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
A Civil Litigation,,,,really Roger. How could that be Mr Brown? Im sure you can re-site the American Inventors Protection Act word for word since you post it all over different forums and have wrote articles about Inventor Submission Companys. If you think the Company's that wanted to help John for MONEY have any recoarse against him it pretty much proves you dont understand the rules of the Protection Act.
Once the Company's sent John the contract to sign they need to give there success rate.....That wasnt done by any of them. Chris Hawker from Trident Design was the only one that stepped up to the plate and didnt throw a curve ball to the Inventor......
Hats off to Chris and his firm "Trident Design" !
Roger Brown • As I said before "I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
What is hard to understand about that? Is my answer the answer you want NO. Does it have to be the answer you want NO. I prefer to let the situation work its self out without my involvement. You may like spending your time in court, I have better things to do with my time. I do appreciate you giving my answering so much weight.
Were sure Roger Brown's creating damage for Edison Nation/Enventys Business Model now that he's on their team.
inventorspotforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=4311&start=50Cached
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Scammer-caught-his-pants-down-4272143.S.107404200
We could have copied more but to be honest, it
was becoming painful to read the rant falling off the tips of inventor, Roger
Brown’s fingers. He was fully intending to create trouble and fighting in
threads. Maybe he’s having ANOTHER bad day?
The important part below is this: Roger Brown
claims he is not a staff member of the UIA and even insinuated John Young
created a fake email to imply Brown had such an email account.
Maybe he didn’t think John would pull the move
he did. Anyone is welcome to email John and ask for Roger Brown’s UIA sent
email. We never thought Roger was as sly as Reyland but here we have it shining
through. Reyland must finally be proud to call Roger `friend` opposed to the
other more flavorable names Mark Reyland has been quoted calling Roger Brown.
Nice
that Roger is slapping the words all over, given to him by Mark Reyland, that
companies are about to sue John Young. Good move guys.
You told the wrong man Reyland...dribble... dribble ...dribble...his ego is as
big as yours and his constant NEED to show he has inside information is a
burden for him to hold.
Were betting Roger has no place to hide now that Reyland left him in the sand box with the Pitt Bulls. He needs to watch where he steps in the sand,those arent Baby Ruth Bars or Cigars laying around. NEED A LIGHT ROGER?
Roger Brown • Actually John I was responding to your
responses. I can't help you had trouble answering. And it was you who took it
in another direction not me. That was your fault not mine. No, I am not a UIA Staff member.
I have answered questions on licensing for them so have others that have experience
in diferent fields. There are some patent attorneys that respond to those types
of questions as they have time. I also am a moderator and contributer for
Inventorspot.com,answer a number of questions here on Linkedin and a number of
different blogs, I answer questions on a number of forums and write articles
for blogs, Inventor's Digest magazine and do speaking engagements on inventing
and licensing. I have never denied doing any of those. It is you and your
buddies that try and make something sinister out of it.
Your turn Troy , are you doing the patent searches for John's company? Will you be listed on their ewebsite showing your credentials?
Your turn Troy , are you doing the patent searches for John's company? Will you be listed on their ewebsite showing your credentials?
Then Gizmo turns Roger upside down with his Edible Sneakers concept. Roger ran like a scared pussy cat and never answered.
Troy Robison • Roger,What exactly does your statement below mean?
"I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
A Civil Litigation,,,,really Roger. How could that be Mr Brown? Im sure you can re-site the American Inventors Protection Act word for word since you post it all over different forums and have wrote articles about Inventor Submission Companys. If you think the Company's that wanted to help John for MONEY have any recoarse against him it pretty much proves you dont understand the rules of the Protection Act.
Once the Company's sent John the contract to sign they need to give there success rate.....That wasnt done by any of them. Chris Hawker from Trident Design was the only one that stepped up to the plate and didnt throw a curve ball to the Inventor......
Hats off to Chris and his firm "Trident Design" !
Roger Brown • As I said before "I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
What is hard to understand about that? Is my answer the answer you want NO. Does it have to be the answer you want NO. I prefer to let the situation work its self out without my involvement. You may like spending your time in court, I have better things to do with my time. I do appreciate you giving my answering so much weight.
Troy Robison • Roger,You dont need to get involved with John's issue.
Lets look at it this way. If another Inventor invented an Edible Pair of Sneaker's out of Fruit RollUps and the lace eyelets dissolved in your mouth not the shoes or your hands and tasted like M&M'S ,Would it be ok for A,B,C or D, Inventor Submission Companys to tell the Inventor they have a good idea with their sneakers.Then they send the Inventor a contract to sign asking for money. Do they need to supply their success rate with the contract. Keep in mind once they send the contract their asking the inventor to sign a legal document.
At that point wouldnt the American Inventors Protection Act FEDERAL RULES kick in? Since you love to recite the act and rules this should be an easy question for you to answer. If your alittle rusty remembering how the act reads Google it then come back and answer.
Both of us know the Sneakers would never fly in retail and make the inventor any money. Dont We.......With that being said what are your thoughts?
Roger the info below was written by you roughly one yr ago........Do you have a change of Heart these days......
Look at what these companies are REQUIRED to share with you (IN WRITING) BEFORE you spend money with them. If they change the subject or try and not give you what is REQUIRED by LAW, WHY WOULD YOU USE THEM? It’s YOUR money you are wasting by not doing a little research.
The AIPA requires invention promoters (i.e., those who provide “invention promotion services”) to disclose a number of things in writing, prior to entering into a contract for invention promotion services. These are:
(1) the total number of inventions evaluated by the invention promoter for commercial potential in the past 5 years, as well as the number of those inventions that received positive evaluations, and the number of those inventions that received negative evaluations;
(2) the total number of customers who have contracted with the invention promoter in the past 5 years, not including customers who have purchased trade show services, research, advertising, or other nonmarketing services from the invention promoter, or who have defaulted in their payment to the invention promoter;
(3) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received a net financial profit as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter;
(4) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received license agreements for their inventions as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter; and
(5) the names and addresses of all previous invention promotion companies with which the invention promoter or its officers have collectively or individually been affiliated in the previous 10 years.
http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/giving-up-on-entrepeneurship
Lets look at it this way. If another Inventor invented an Edible Pair of Sneaker's out of Fruit RollUps and the lace eyelets dissolved in your mouth not the shoes or your hands and tasted like M&M'S ,Would it be ok for A,B,C or D, Inventor Submission Companys to tell the Inventor they have a good idea with their sneakers.Then they send the Inventor a contract to sign asking for money. Do they need to supply their success rate with the contract. Keep in mind once they send the contract their asking the inventor to sign a legal document.
At that point wouldnt the American Inventors Protection Act FEDERAL RULES kick in? Since you love to recite the act and rules this should be an easy question for you to answer. If your alittle rusty remembering how the act reads Google it then come back and answer.
Both of us know the Sneakers would never fly in retail and make the inventor any money. Dont We.......With that being said what are your thoughts?
Roger the info below was written by you roughly one yr ago........Do you have a change of Heart these days......
Look at what these companies are REQUIRED to share with you (IN WRITING) BEFORE you spend money with them. If they change the subject or try and not give you what is REQUIRED by LAW, WHY WOULD YOU USE THEM? It’s YOUR money you are wasting by not doing a little research.
The AIPA requires invention promoters (i.e., those who provide “invention promotion services”) to disclose a number of things in writing, prior to entering into a contract for invention promotion services. These are:
(1) the total number of inventions evaluated by the invention promoter for commercial potential in the past 5 years, as well as the number of those inventions that received positive evaluations, and the number of those inventions that received negative evaluations;
(2) the total number of customers who have contracted with the invention promoter in the past 5 years, not including customers who have purchased trade show services, research, advertising, or other nonmarketing services from the invention promoter, or who have defaulted in their payment to the invention promoter;
(3) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received a net financial profit as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter;
(4) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received license agreements for their inventions as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter; and
(5) the names and addresses of all previous invention promotion companies with which the invention promoter or its officers have collectively or individually been affiliated in the previous 10 years.
http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/giving-up-on-entrepeneurship
Were sure Roger Brown's creating damage for Edison Nation/Enventys Business Model now that he's on their team.
inventorspotforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=4311&start=50Cached
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Scammer-caught-his-pants-down-4272143.S.107404200
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
I'm faking that email Huh, if you are saying that, I'm publicly calling you a liar. And will prove the email is real by forwarding it to anyone that wants to see proof that you are a LIAR and not to be trusted.
IF you are saying that I faked that email, you have just been caught in a lie to these inventors.
If anyone would like to see proof that Roger Brown is lying about being a UIA staff member, email me at tandjyoung@att.net and I will forwarded you the email as proof of my claims.
Also Roger stands beside the UIA and what these companies tried to do to the stick invention, All I had to do was sign the contract and pay,and I was riped off by UIA accredited medallion member companies. The same UIA that is supposed to be looking out for the inventors wanted to take my money for a stupid invention just as the other rip off companies did.
If these companies are going to sue me for what they did, that was totally unethical. You don't have to worry. Let me worry and you can answer the question.
THE question is, what do YOU think of what the UIA companies tried to do, they wanted to take money from an inventor with absolutely no chance of getting to market ?
Was it the correct think to do, yes or no?
Do you approve of them doing this , yes or no ?
If you don't answer this, then its obvious that you don't want to say how you feel about it, because it will go badly for them. Or you approve of what and how they did it and you could careless about the inventors and wont answer because you don't want them angry with you because you stand with them.
Answer it for all to see how you really feel and who you really are. Don't worry about a law suite because your answer wont be used in court, its an opinion and not relevant to any law suite, so don't use that as an excuse.
Get ready everyone the dancing clown show will now begin. Because he WILL NOT answer the question !