And the Final Word on this discussion? Guilty!

 Gizmo's answer to Inventor Roger Brown.


 By Troy Robison on LinkedIn
 Ok Roger you’re getting my response to your answers so you can stop whining like a little Kid…. By the way Roger you have shown your TRUE colors. It’s pretty obvious from your actions. You make up learning lesson on all the forums for inventors/ idea people to learn from. I think there great and a way to help people walk down the correct path not making the mistakes most of us have made in the past.

See some of your Lessons below, Pay close attention to # 7 to 10

1, Lesson # 31 Does having a Patent Guarantee You Will Make Your Money Back?
2, Lesson # 36 Sell Sheet Challenge # 2
3. Lesson # 32 You Need To Have Realistic Expectations
4. Lesson # 27 Quit Posting Your Invention on Youtube and Facebook
5. Lesson # 17 How Much Are You Willing To Spend On Your Idea Before Asking For Help?
6. Lesson # 34 This There Anything Wrong With This NDA?
7. Lesson # 32 You Are Not Doing Thorough Research On Your Idea
8. Invention Submisson Company Horror Stories
9. Why Invention Submission Companies are so Confusing.
10. Do You ask Invention Submission Companies Questions?

Roger your lessons above are all informative and people should learn from them all. People/Inventors should pay close attention to number 7 in the list because it is the most important and should be put at the top of the list because “RESEARCH” is the name of the inventor game. Proper research can reveal all the info in numbers 8 to 9 above if the inventor puts in enough time digging and asking question from some of the so called experts/veterans in the industry.

Roger you pound the word Research into the inventors heads all the time because it is important. I guess I don’t understand if I did all the proper research on Reyland with a list of the PROOF that he isn’t a successful product developer. He doesn’t have any products in retail with multiple Patents along with multi-million dollar License deals and he isn’t a Black Afro American man (Anthony High) that knows Hand to hand combat and the rest of the long list of Lies he has told. Roger why haven’t you dug deep into my accusations/claims to prove me wrong. Instead you are all worried about a lie you think I told about you getting a seat on the UIA. That’s the reason people look at it like you’re not really for protecting inventors.

Roger you have pounded inventors submission companies like Davison,AbsolutleyNew,Invent Help, Invention Home etc and posted the American Inventors Act hundreds of times on a few different inventor forums. I guess we all would like to know why you thought it was so important to post about ,especially if some of the claims against the submission companies was just hear say.
Continued below....

• Roger, you say you’re out for helping/protecting inventors. If that’s the case then why don’t you give us your opinion on the actual facts we accuse Reyland of Lying about. The research has been done and it’s easy to follow. That’s the reason Reyland keeps avoiding the questions I ask.

When Reyland told me about the UIA Executive Director position he was being interviewed for it was a shock to me because he kept it quiet until the last few weeks before a decision was going to be made. I asked him how did that all come about, did you apply for the position. He said no they approached him for the position. I just didn’t believe that BS because if the UIA did the PROPER research on Reyland they would of found out what an abusive controlling person with mulit-personalities he has on a few of the inventor forums . I understand know why he didn’t tell anyone about him interviewing for the Directors position. He was afraid the un-ethical crap he pulled off on Tania would be exposed publically putting a stop to him getting the position. It was weeks later after he was awarded the Directors position things blew up and the Tania scandal was exposed to the public. That’s when he denied all the claims and said were all full of crap and nuts.

Roger, Reyland told me after he gets in the UIA he is going to sit down with Warren Tuttle the UIA acting President and get him to have Louis Foreman to tell everyone how he gets Edison Nation past looking like an inventor submission company. He wanted Louis and others off the UIA Board and wanted to bring his own team in “NEW BLOOD”. The email below should be enough evidence to prove Reyland WANTED Louis Forman out and re-organize the UIA.


http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-06-11T16%3A00%3A00-07%3A00&max-results=7

Continued below,,,,,

0

 • Roger you were mentioned in that conversation and so was Kenny Durham and one other person. I don’t remember the other person’s full name only because I never heard of him before, I think his first name was Jeff or something like that. I really didn’t know too much about Kenny either just that he owned Innovators Warehouse.

Roger you can say if you want to that the info was here say because it was a verbal conversation with me and Reyland. But remember I could say your info about inventor Submission Companies treating inventor wrong is here say also.

John & Group Members I have NO reason to apologize to Roger Brown. The conversation between Reyland and me did for a fact take place. If you look at all the info that has been posted with proof it would be easy to think Roger Brown was in fact looking to get a seat on the UIA Board or take over Warren Tuttle’s President Position. I guess the question remains is if I wouldn’t have brought up the accusations about
Roger and the UIA would he have taken a position if offered it ? My guess is yes but that’s my opinion because Roger has protected Reyland from the get go and never really said Reyland looks guilty.

The info below was published today, it’s sad people didn’t look at the big picture when it was exposed from day one. It all could have been stopped in its tracks early on but it wasn’t. Very sad if you ask me.

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/colleges/133758988.html?cmpid=15585797

Reyland keeps saying both him and his family are being stalked. The copy of his email below proves him wrong. Look at the date of the email, it was sent shortly after I exposed him one yr ago.

continued below

From: Mark Reyland Mark@Creative3D.local
Subject: EN
To: "Margaret" < >, "Sally" < >, "Troy" <gizmo >, tania@, "Ron" <rjlinnov@ >
Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 7:20 AM

I wanted you all to know that I have left EN but not because of you. I’m leaving EN because of my family. I was struck pretty hard when my daughter called me crying and asked if I was okay. One of her friends had come across EN and sent her a link to these postings, she read much of what you all wrote, and it hurt her deeply - as it did my wife.

I have worked hard to help inventors, and in fact I have helped most of you. Taking my time and in many cases spending my own money to help people find a little success.

Obviously you all feel I have wronged you in some way, and that’s ok. What I would ask you to do is take a moment and remember the ways I have helped you.
Please understand in the future when you wage war against someone publicly you hurt not only them, but the people who care about them.

Good luck to you all, and I wish you much success with your inventing.
Mark 

Just as Reyland ended this email with well wishes, he was still busy on the forums publicly bashing the inventors and stalking Tania daily.

So there you go Roger, I fulfilled your request. You need to look in the MIRROR and really make a decision if your 100% dedicated to the inventor community and want to help or Talk out of Both Side Of Your MOUTH .

John and other group members I apologize to you all for my long post. It needed to be done this way.

My Vote is Obvious Reyland is GUILTY .

__________________________________________

We have been sent an email from someone who has reason to believe Mark Reyland has hired a reputaion defender to help bury all the bad about him. It won't work Reyland but it may just burn a hole in your wallet! We known you don't have any money from your made up product development company. Maybe you can dig into the UIA money bucket to pay the companies fee's.

Have you seen the pictures in Images of Reyland? Can you guess which one he used for his profile picture in the ladies forums? We'll give you a hint...it's the one which looks like it was taken when he was in his 30's. WOW, he must REALLY believe he's charming because he's almost 50! The picture of him below isnt his hair, It's been PhotoShopped BigTime

So far the only NOT GUILTY vote is by Mark Reyland himself .

Mark T.Unfollow Follow Mark T.

Mark T. Reyland • I vote Not Guilty....it's not a death penalty case is it?.... cuz I don't think you guys should sentence me to death.

Do you guys ever listen to yourselves?

  You really should get some help

Reyland seems to be having fun and making light of very important issues in the inventing community, as usual, he doesn't care unless it's him who is bringing up the issue.

Looks like inventor Roger Brown got the attention he was so desperately seeking! Dare we all say it? It's about time someone wrote what everyone else is thinking!

johnUnfollowFollow john

Email to Roger Brown I sent yesterday, about this Gizmo Stuff. How much more fair can I be.

Hello Roger,

Troy commented, but it was lengthy, So I deleted it to keep the focus on the voting. I will keep my word that you will have a chance to have an explanation from him. But you are going to have to start it yourself. I took everything to another discussion but decided to delete it for the sake of the members. Everyone is sick of it, now its up to you, if its that important to you, go ahead, I wont delete it until you are satisfied with the answer. Then it gets deleted
john

11 hours ago

johnUnfollow Follow john

john Young • Troy Robison • Roger

I did answer you not once but twice. John deleted the first one because it was too long. The second one got deleted because he wanted the Votes to come in first. I’m pretty sure John told me he sent you an email indicating I answered you and he deleted it......For some reason I think once a post is made on the LinkedIn Group thread it automatically goes to the ACTIVE GROUP members email and can still be viewed even though it was deleted ,,,doesn’t it Roger. I had one of your posts in my email that John deleted that couldn’t be viewed on the Group Page. Am I mistaken Roger?

If I’m right then it looks like you graduated from Reyland's School of Manipulation. It only took you 13 months to go from an Apprentice to Journeyman Manipulator. Did he also teach you Explosive Recognition and Response, Hand To Hand Combat, Crisis Negotiation, Juvenile Justice, Gang Awareness, Dusting and Lifting a Box of Sea Salted FRENCH FRIES from a FAST FOOD Joint “Preferably Wendys” along with Hand to Hand Combat? Oh yeah the Hand to Hand Combat comes in play if Someone tries to STEAL his FRENCH FRIES but it’s OK for him to Steal Someone's Intellectual Property (Patent Application, Invention) isn’t it Roger.

Maybe the link below will refresh your memory Roger.

http://adealwithmarkreyland.blogspot.com/?zx=e71411545843d58a


Roger did Reyland at least teach you not to make the same MISTAKE he did when copying someone else's Resume then forget to remove that person’s name before using it as his own Resume? You know the situation Roger I’m sure, you know Mr. Anthony High's resume a BLACK a Heroic Medalist Afro American Man from New Jersey. The number one Golden rule all inventors are taught is leave a paper trail to follow just in case something goes wrong on their Invention/Idea Journey. Thats just the opposite of what a Conman is taught. It looks like Reyland or one of his other personalities got the two confused and left us all a paper trail to follow a mile long proving he is not the man he says he is.

Roger maybe the link below will refresh your memory.
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2011/09/will-real-mark-reyland-please-stand-up.html

Roger why don’t you take Kevin's advice and get over Gizmo/Me. I didn’t screw over anyone especially STEAL their Invention, it was your buddy Reyland that did.

By the way Roger I Vote GUILTY. What’s your Vote gonna be SPORT?

Sorry John I had to do it. I apologize to you and all the other Group Members.

 

john Young • ONE OTHER THING ROGER, THIS WAS NEVER ABOUT YOU. IT ALL STARTED WHEN YOU STARTED SUPPORTING MARK.

AS PROOF YOU ARE LOADING HIS GUNS AS HE FIRES BLINDLE. WHY DID YOU SEND MARK , TANIAS EMAIL THAT SHE SENT TO YOU BY MISTAKE, FOR MARK TO POST HERE ???

IT SEEMS THAT YOU SUPPORT HIM BY THIS, IF YOU WERE TAKING NO SIDES AS YOU CLAIM, WHY DID YOU SEND IT ???

WHY DID YOU WANT THE VOTING POSTPONED ???

WHY DO YOU TRY TO TAKE THE HEAT OFF MARK BY COMMENTING ABOUT YOU AND GIZMO WHEN NO ONE HERE EVEN KNOWS WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON BETWEEN YOU TWO ??

I THINK THIS PROVES MY POINT !!

IM SO SICK OF THIS SHIT, YES I STARTED IT, BUT NEVER WANTED YOU AS A DISCRACTION !!!!

SO I HAD TO START THIS DISCUSSION TO STOP YOU FROM CRYING AND FILLING UP THE OTHER THREAD.

STAY HERE WITH THIS SHIT ,AND STAY THE HELL OFF THE BBQ THREAD !!!!
UNLESS YOU ARE GOING TO VOTE, YOU KNOW ALL TO WELL THE PROOF THAT WAS POSTED HERE, SO NOW SHOW EVERYONE HOW YOU REALLY FEEL AND GO TO THE BBQ ONE LAST TIME AND VOTE. I WANT TO HAVE EVERYONE KNOW WHAT YOUR VOTE IS, GUILTY,,,,, OR,,,,,NOT GUILTY.
ITS THAT SIMPLE !!!!!!!!

john

Does Conman Reyland Have a Conman Friend?

We have to say these inventors are sharp and know their stuff. It's not about venting, or beating a dead horse. It's about making the inventing industry a little safer for new inventors coming in. Seasoned inventors won't fall for these guys but it's not seasoned inventors we're all worried about. Why expose Reyland and his dirty little friends? Because it's what we all should be doing, looking out for one another and making the statement...not in MY community! Good job guys!

johnUnfollowFollow john

HUTTON JOVAN PULITZER SCAM { B U S T E D !!!! }

Well I thought something was up. It was funny that someone would suddenly appear saying why they joined the group, instead of just joining. I also found it odd that our new 4 members were Roger Brown { which I'm not saying had anything to do with it } and Hutton from Texas and the other 2 from Texas. Then he post how wonderful he is at inventing. Then he targets my discussions. Well you all have been scammed by Mark Reyland, why Mark. The like on his comment was from Texas, Hutton is from Texas, and Hutton's message was STOP THE PUKE. Clearly to disrupt the BBQ. And as I commented, I knew sooner than later he would provoke me in to a confirmation about it. Add it all up and you know how Tania feels now. Carolyn This is the leader of your UIA, how do you feel now. Brian, Luminita, you were almost scammed by him. Google him under scams with his name and you will see a long list to view. Can I prove it was Mark that put him up to this, NO, but it is more likely than not. Also Troy did some research, I will let him have the honors of telling you what he found. This is why I do this, scams, to protect you and me. I agree that this back and fourth name calling is bull, but its necessary to expose these scams for what they are. Now that this guy got in , Im going to make the group private. I will google everyone from this point on. Come on Mark do you think that I'm that stupid. Admit it, it stings just a little !!!




J. Jovan Philyaw reinvents himself again
() By Eric Celeste Thursday, Apr 10 2003
A few years ago, we told you about Dallas' own Music Man, J. Jovan Philyaw ("Goodbye Kitty," June 6, 2001), the man behind the CueCat, Net Talk Live!, Tripledge Wipers and other testaments to his con-artistry. Now, Jovan has reinvented himself again--and this time, Buzz must say, he's really outdone himself, in the same entertainingly psycho way that Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf outdoes himself with each new press conference. ("There are no tanks. Oh, those tanks, the ones behind me? We have those tanks surrounded.")

Jovan is no longer Jovan. Now he's J. Hutton Pulitzer. Does Mr. Pulitzer have anything to do with the recently announced Pulitzer Prizes? No. What does Mr. Pulitzer do? Not sure. Read his Web site (www.jhuttonpulitzer.com) and see if you can figure it out. When Dmagazine tried to find out, mean ol' JHP just swore at the mag.

Buzz, however, is confident that there are two things we know for sure about JHP. First, we know that he's selling his crystals. What crystals, you ask? The ones that make up the "Pulitzer Collection" (www.pulitzercollection.com)--a.k.a., a coupla hunks of mineral that used to adorn his offices at Digital Convergence Corp., the company that brought you the CueCat and helped send its primary investor, The Dallas Morning News, into a PR nightmare.

The second thing we know about JHP is why he's selling these objects of "powerful spiritual significance," as he puts it. That's because even though, according to his Web site, the Pulitzer Collection "represents Gods' [sic] devine [double sic] communication of Himself and beauty to humanity," the Lord ain't been so good to Jovan's pocketbook lately. For example, Digital Convergence last year filed for Chapter 7 protection from creditors, meaning DCC's remaining assets could be liquidated to pay the bills.

Apparently shielded from that secular action were these magnificent crystals, which were created when "70 million years ago, God touched the earth," JHP notes. (Odd, since you'd think God would have done so when the earth was created some 4.6 billion years ago, but, hey, Buzz ain't no theologian.) If you would like to purchase the Pulitzer Collection--to channel its incredible huckster power, to ward off gargoyles, to simply use as a paperweight--you can do so on the Web site. Buzz opens the bidding at $37.5 million...oh, wait, that's how much CueCat cost the Morning News. Oh, dear. Now Buzz is confused.

4 hours ago

• Close viewer

• Like
• Comment
• Unfollow
• Flag
  • Flag as Promotion
  • Flag as Job
  • Flag as Inappropriate
• More
  • Reply Privately

5 comments

johnUnfollow Follow john

john Young • www.patentbuddy.com/Inventor/Pulitzer-Jovan-Hutton/2351740

3 hours ago• Unlike• Like

• • Reply privately
• • Flag as inappropriate
• • Flag as promotion

0

johnUnfollow Follow john

john Young • Where They Are Now
By: Fast CompanyMarch 1, 2004
Fast Company readers asked us to help track down once-prominent business leaders and innovators who have largely fallen off the business radar. Here's what the Fast Company team discovered about the now-old New Economy luminaries.

J. Jovan Philyaw

Then: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Digital:Convergence Corp.

Now: What do you do once you've bilked companies such as the Belo Corp., Radio Shack, Young & Rubicam, and Coca-Cola of investments between $10 million and $37.5 million for a product that flops? You change your name. Philyaw, the masterful pitchman between the CueCat, a cutely named handheld barcode scanner that was supposed to bridge print media and the Web, apparently now does business under the name J. Hutton Pulitzer -- or the one-word moniker "Jovan." Operating J. Hutton Pulitzer and Co. out of Dallas, the inventor of what has been decried as "one of the most ridiculed products of the Internet era," now specializes in the "development of unique intellectual property." Such as? Bottled rainwater. Crystals. And a forthcoming book entitled Generational Curses. Will Jovan be foiled again? Only time will tell.

Date Requested: Feb. 19, 2004

3 hours ago• Unlike• Like

• • Reply privately
• • Flag as inappropriate
• • Flag as promotion

0

PeterUnfollow Follow Peter

Peter Dunn • Excellent work John I knew that there was something strange about the guy..His photo is creepy and the way he abused you out of the blue really got me thinking. Talk about arriving on the scene beating his chest screaming out listen to me was weird..People like that are just full of themselves or whoever’s ego that he possess at the time

3 hours ago• Unlike• Like

• • Reply privately
• • Flag as inappropriate
• • Flag as promotion

0

Troy Robison • John,

I’m not really sure what to say about your findings. All I can say is if you go to freepatentsonline.com and do a patent applications search on (J. Hutton Pulitzer) you will find there are 48 "Published" applications. 46 out of 48 were published in 2006; the other 2 were in 2007.

I looked at all of them then decided to search “patents only” and didn’t find any that were issued. So I decided I need to go check a few of the applications in the USPTO Patent Pair files. After checking out 4 to 5 I decided there was something very wrong because everyone of the applications I looked at indicated the published applications went abandoned due to “Failure to respond to office actions” to the USPTO.

After checking out all 48 applications all of them had been abandoned due to not responding to office actions to the USPTO. What that means John is there are NO patents that were issued to J, Hutton Pulitzer that are tied to the 48 apps.

I also found it strange in the USPTO Pair “File Wrapper” there was files that shown Notification of withdrawal of Attorney (Power of Attorney) was transferred back to J.Hutton Pulitzer with 2 different TEXAS addresses in all the apps. One in Frisco and the other in Addison Texas There were files indicating a change of address also, and then when the USPTO mailed the abandoned letter to Hutton it was returned to the USPTO Undelivered.

Searching Jeffry Jovan Philyaw patents or applications will produce some in his name alone. Some will show David Kent Mathews from Carrollton, TX as co-inventor also. With the Assignee listed as Digital Convergence Corporation in Dallas Texas.

(If) the Hutton person you’re confronting is the same person as the applications I located then yes there is a problem with his identity and claims.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CueCat

39 minutes ago

-----------------------------------------------------------
and it looks like Roger Brown is just getting on everyone's nerves as usual with his constant whining and apparent need for attention. We think Derek Pater has it right when he calls Roger at playing decoy to move the attention away from Reyland....

john Young • Roger,

I have no problem having Gizmo answer it. If you want to start a new discussion fine with me. But this thread is done. Everyone is sick of this crap and so am I. I understand you want him to say it ! But Ive already said his claims are baseless !

What do you want, should we start this crap over again. Lets ask the members ?

Start a discussion and I will stand by my claims for you, or if you really want to take Hutton and Brian's advice let it go! Seems when It comes to Mark you want it over, but not when it comes to Gizmo you want the bitchfest! Perhaps I should change the name of the group to { Inventors for American Entertainment }. Its up to you Gizmo, One last post to show proof about Roger or say you don't have it, then its over. Roger This was about Mark, no one here ever saw anything about you other than my suggesting you have an interest in the UIA. You said publicly NO so my claims are baseless

I really didn't see any claims Gizmo had about you other than that here!

THE VOTE STARTS NOW !!!! We can get in to your claims later, Don't try to delay the vote. EVERYONE PLEASE VOTE,,,,,, NOW I NEED YOUR HELP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

john
------------------------------------------------------

We agree. Other than Troy's insinuation that Roger was looking for a position in the UIA, we have not seen any accusations made by him against Roger. We also insinuated the same thing. Guess Roger Brown really wants everyone to understand he does not want to be part of the UIA. We don't blame him really.

Does Reyland Enjoy Attacking Women?

Other than his possible disrespect for women, we’re wondering why Mark Reyland of the UIA would set out to bash another female owned business, so we went to see if we could find the issue THIS time. Here’s the site ran by some very successful women and it appears to be growing. Why wouldn’t we all cheer them on?  www.womentorz.com

We see Stephen’s new book and Invention Home’s website advertising on there. So what’s the problem? Does Mark want Womentorz to become a UIA member and they declined? We’re told this leads to this type of public bashing/ harrassment and bullying by Mark Reyland.

Is Mark angry they have Invention Home advertising on there when the owner of Invention Home is on the board of the UIA? Did he feel since they have a board member, they should give into him?

Does Mark have hurt feelings and feels the need to lash out?

Is Mark angry Stephen’s new book it on their site because Mark has personal jealousy problems with Stephen? It’s no secret in the inventing community this has always been the case and Reyland doesn’t like Stephen’s informative site for inventors. It’s all free information and contacts here at www.inventornotes.com but Mark isn't listed as an expert.

Is Mark angry Womentorz won’t feature him as some sort of expert and advertise his UIA “blog of anger” which nobody appears to have interest in reading?  

Mark Reyland always appears angry at someone or bashing someone’s business publicly, either under his UIA title or some fictional character he creates and then spends more hours than the week holds in public forums and sending emails trying to destroy businesses, inventors' products and/or individuals.  We've heard he's the king of accounts when leaving complaints on sites about inventors' products and especially had it out for EN at one point.  

Mark’s quoted in his blog of anger, that he was contacted to review the value offered on the Womentorz site.

Our opinion? Nobody asked him his opinion; maybe he just needed a way to start off his bashing against another woman owned company. If he didn’t know about Womentorz for the past couple of years, then we suggest he doesn’t know the female inventing community at all like he claims but the truth is probably more that he felt thrown aside or ignored by them when he wants to be part of their growth and make them UIA approved. Maybe the claims made about him hating strong women holds some truth to it? 

The other quote from Mark Reyland’s UIA blog of anger we find interesting is him calling down members of forums and insulting them. Calling people lonely and needing a false identity to hide behind. 

He also insists most information found on inventing is wrong or even damaging when we have no evidence he’s even an inventor himself! How does he teach something we have no evidence of him ever doing himself?

BUT

Since we’re writing about identities, when he was appearing as Johnny Gee on Edison Nation with the 20-something male model avatar, was this the way he identified himself in his world? And here we just thought it was him conning people to get his own way and wanting to chat to a female inventor he couldn’t seem to leave alone. This begs the question, Is Mark Reyland lonely and needing to break the silence of his own existence? After all, he did write that in his UIA blog of anger.

 http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/why-not-have-an-expert

We say to Womentorz. Don't be surprised if new members begin coming forward and asking why you are not UIA approved or that you should have Mark Reyland as an expert on your site. One may even be name, Jenny Gee!