Showing posts with label looking to license. Show all posts
Showing posts with label looking to license. Show all posts

Wednesday, 29 August 2012

Mark Reyland UIA/USA = Scary Stalker

When was the last time anyone even heard from one of the women Mark Reyland enjoys STALKING? Not in a while that we can find. Here's where Reyland made ANOTHER stalking mistake. He's been trying to find one of his stalking victims and accidentally landed on someone's blog.
We've had a few blog and website owners contact us recently about this search of his, claiming hundreds of hits on their websites while he uses the same search terms, so we thought it was time to expose him for this one. The below information was forwarded to us to show he will never stop STALKING the women (and their families) he terrorizes. Wait until his wife Debra get's wind of his WOMEN STALKING.
 
This guy is sick and in charge of the UIA/USA United Inventors Association and backed by Warren Tuttle, a product scout for Lifetime Brands.
Hundreds of hours working for inventors; or hundreds of hours stalking his female victims?
And this MORON has the audacity to claim he's working with the FBI and being STALKED. He also said the UIA is burning up funds allocated for Inventor Education on Legal fees to stop his stalkers. Wait until the IRS gets in their non for profit books,then the Legal fees will go CA-CHING....CA-CHING.....
 
 
Here's Reyland's tracked information. Look at his search query. This is just one of many different search terms he has been using to stalk an inventor.
 
Page Views:1                                       Location: West Chester, Ohio, United States
3                                                 
Entry Page Time:                                
22 Jul 2012 13:45:51                
Visit Length:
32 seconds                          
                                                 IP Address:Road Runner (174.101.194.172)
Browser:                                  

IE 9.0                                       
Win7
Resolution:
1280x720                              Referring URL:www.123people.co.uk/ext/frm?ti=person%20finder&search_term=tania%20reynaert&search_country=GB&st=person%20finder&target_url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy50YW5pYXJleW5hZXJ0LmNvbS8%3D&section=domain&wrt_id=580   
  
 
We all know Reyland lives at 8046 Putting Green Lane in Westchester Ohio 45069 and his phone number is 513-405-7475.


"John Young's getting to be one hell of a researcher. Maybe Mark Reyland can get him a job with his FBI Buddys he claims to have. The info below makes us laugh HYSTERICALLY ,,,HAHA Reyland got caught AGAIN,,,"

NObullship Inventor education,scams and Good companies, LinkedIn

The apple doesnt fall far from the tree.... google is great !
A few days ago, I get a call from a Number that I didnt recognize by a name it used that I forgot. The caller said in a voice { that I wasnt sure was a man or woman and thought it was being disguised }, are you the one who has the Mark Reyland blog. At first I answered yes thinking it was this group it was talking about, but then realized it meant the Mark Reyland Blogspot, and I said No. It went on to explain it needed to get in touch with the owner of it because it had " some information ". I said " no I dont have anything to do with that blog and dont know who runs it ". It went on to ask if there was anyway I could find out, I said no, try leaving a comment and ask for them to call you or email you.
So I asked what kind of information, it said, I will only share it with the blog. I said fine, I dont know who ownes it and wish they didnt have me involved by posting my discussions and showing my name and photo, It was around long before I came around inventing and that should prove its not mine. So the call ends and I look at the number and store it because I found it odd that someone would call me out of the blue and ask that.

The person on the phone I was referring to as an "IT " was because I didnt know who it was or if it was male or a female voice. So today I googled the phone number several things poped up but my attention was drawn to a trademark from the USPTO. I clicked on it and what did I find ?

(words only): STREETEATS

Standard Character claim: No

Current Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all documents in this file, click on the Trademark Document Retrieval link at the top of this page.

Date of Status: 2011-08-08

Filing Date: 2009-10-02

Transformed into a National Application: No

Registration Date: (DATE NOT AVAILABLE)

Register: Principal

Law Office Assigned: LAW OFFICE 111
Phone Number: 917-657-4994

Mark Reyland's son Phillip Reyland with a abandon trade mark for his street vendor app " street eats " which he applied for but let go abandoned.

Next I google " street eats " and find the voice I heard on the phone. it wasnt a disguise, its his voice.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3974034/how-to-track-mobile-food-venders/

So, Mark Reyland says Im contacting his family, { which never happened } He says there are legal proceedings using up UIA funds that could be used for inventors, also that there is an FBI investigation.

So is his son Phillip leading the investigation team, or is it more BS from
Reyland.
I bring this up, because I hate liars, lies such as Im being sued and investigated by the FBI. So heres some of my reasoning that its all lies :

Do you have your son get involed with an attorneys and the FBI's investigation ?
Do you exchange emails with your accused stalker over weeks,sometimes 3 or 4 a day ?
Do you have 3 hour long phone conversations with your stalker talking about inventing, { the call only ended because his battery died }.

So that is why I say the apple doesnt fall far from the tree :
1. abandoned USPTO application { from Mark and his son }
2. Hidden identity when making correspondence { Both of them }
3. Trying to gain information under fraudulent circumstances { Both ot them }

Yea an investigation from an attorney that UIA funds are being diverted from , { sure }.

A FBI investigation being lead by his son, { yea the FBI always uses family members that are being stalked to call the stalker for their investigation }

So I hope you can see the lies of a liar.

This is not to start a fight, but to prove my innocents to his accusations

Friday, 13 April 2012

FundaGeek & Conman Mark Reyland Gets Questioned By Inventor On LinkedIn

WOW...This crowd funding thing is launching like a rocket. But people need to know how best to use it.                   

                        Inventor John Young's Digging in the Rats Nest AGAIN,

john Young

The other is { The Flip Sided Quilting Rulers }, I contacted the inventor and apparently you DO NOT have the contract on that either, another fraudulent claim . NOT selling in retail. Again in violation of the UIA code of ethics.

                     Reyland posted this on Edison Nation about a year ago!
UPDATE: Since I wrote this (several months ago) we have licensed the entire line of FlipSide (www.flipsiderulers.com) quilting rulers to a manufacturer in California, and 4 additional quilting products I developed for my quilting friends to the largest quilting products manufacturer in the world (Prym Dritz).The lesson here is that sometimes you have to immerse yourself in the consumer’s world to truly understand what they want.

The REAL lesson here is BEWARE of Mark Reyland. Everything that comes out of his MOUTH is Bull$hit!

We wonder what Inventor Roger Brown thinks of his Buddy Reyland now! Louis Foreman & Matt Spangard from EDISON NATION/ENVENTYS need to take Brown down to the closest river and wash his Dirty Face & Hands off  after playing with Conman Reyland!

               http://www.edisonnation.com/posts?q=flipside+rulers&commit=Search


The other { Nova eye glass pads } you have listed as patented. A utility patent. but my searching cant find any such patent. Anyway can you get a utility patent on eye glass pad's ? And again they are NOT selling in retail. Here's the link to that :

                               http://www.matchproduct.com/Products/Detail/640

If there is no patent on the Nova eye glass pad"s, Once more a fraudulent claim, and in violation of the UIA code of ethics.

Now your { Twist Cap"s },where are they selling. No where that I can find in retail, and they have no IP protection as none of your other products do.

Actually only 2 products are yours as far as I know. and NONE are selling in retail as you claim on your biography, yet again a fraudulent claim. And inviolation of UIA code of ethics.

{ In addition to his role with the UIA, Mr. Reyland is an accomplished inventor with {{many retail products on the market }}, and CEO of Obvious Ideas LLC, a Cincinnati based Product Development Company. }

So there's 4 violations of the UIA's code of ethics by the Executive Director
Mark Reyland.

UIA Code of Ethics
# I. Personal and Professional Integrity

All staff, board members, members, and volunteers of the United Inventors Association (UIA) act with honesty, integrity and openness in all their dealings as representatives of the UIA. The UIA promotes a working environment that values respect, fairness and integrity.

II. Governance

The UIA has an active governing body that is responsible for setting the mission and strategic direction of the UIA and oversight of the finances, operations, and policies of
the UIA. The governing body:
# 2 Ensures that its board members have the requisite skills and experience to carry out their duties and that all members understand and fulfill their governance duties acting for the benefit of the UIA and its public purpose;

Is responsible for the electing and regular review of the performance of the president,
Ensures that the president and executive director provide the governing body with timely and comprehensive information so that the governing body can effectively carry
out its duties
# 3 Ensures that the UIA conducts all transactions and dealings with integrity and honesty

# 4 Ensures that the UIA promotes working relationships with the president, executive director, board members, service providers, and members that are based on mutual respect, fairness and openness;

Ensures that the UIA is fair and inclusive in its hiring and promotion policies and
practices for all staff and volunteer positions
Ensures that policies of the UIA are in writing, clearly articulated and officially adopted;
Ensures that the resources of the UIA are responsibly and prudently managed; and,
Ensures that the UIA has the capacity to carry out its programs effectively.

I was just wondering about this.
john   :)-  

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Problem is it was wrong to put Mark Reyland in the Provisional patent application to begin with and they both knew it!  We found the following on YouTube: 

             




Saturday, 5 November 2011

Reyland's Premature Ejection

As usual, Mark and his sidekick, inventor Roger Brown started calling inventors stalkers and whiners while trying to convince others that their own lies was actually the truth. It looks like it backfired. This is what appears to have happened.
Mark and Roger start their usual name calling stuff and drive the thread the way they want it to go. As soon as Mark thinks he's on the brink of being exposed as a liar, again, he deletes the thread and sends his buddy Roger in to ask stupid questions he already knows the answers to. Don't you hate that Mark makes you look so stupid Roger? Reyland and Roger then email out announcements of victory. Of course, they copy the thread before Mark deletes it and adds the incomplete discussion thread to their John Doe blog, also as a victory of exposing the truth tellers as liars. It didn't work. A little premature, don't you think Mark? We're sure you're no stranger to those words.
He didn't want to wait for the true outcome of the thread. Now the thread has been re-started so it can finish the way it was intended to finish, with the truth exposed by a party who only wanted to sort out the truth. Looks like this may just be the beginning.

People don't generally like it when you attempt to treat them like idiots. Reyland and Roger need to stop using inventors as their play toys. Looks like Reyland may be stalking another inventor's family now. Too bad Warren Tuttle appears not to give two craps about inventors and continues to hide his head and ride out his time as President of the United Inventors Association. Shame on you Warren Tuttle!
How are the UIA nominations coming along, Roger?
From Linkedin (we'll update this post as it happens)


john  Young

THE MARK REYLAND BBQ IN INVENTION LAND Part 2

Now I get Rogers email, its still the same stuff. So I email back asking do you have the email in which Derek agrees to post about mark for free patent searches. He replies back , no I never said I had them it must have been miscommunication. Miscommunication my ass , I clearly asked to see the emails where Derek agrees to post against Mark in exchange for free patent searches. How can you miscommunicate that ! He must have been hoping that all the stuff that he sent would influence my decision. Now I'm really urinated because I apologized to Mark and said I believed him based on anticipating seeing the email that I hadn't seen after all.

So the next day I get an email from Roger asking if I deleted Marks discussion, its not there. Roger knows that the only ones that can delete a discussion are the one who posted it , the group owner and linked in. But I think this was his attempt to look confused as to how it got deleted.

We all know how it got deleted either by the group owner which could have happened or by Mark that more likely happened. Just as with Fayad, when I exposed him he deleted his discussion. I think that Mark did too because I told him I was going to rip the guilty party apart, and it didn't look good for him.

As I promised it will be quite entertaining for all to see when the time comes. Also I have invented a very specail parting gift for the looser, that I'm sure will get repetitive use.

john
______________________

john  Young
johnUnfollow Follow john
john YoungHello Troy,

I just ask that anything you post make sure you can prove it to everyone. Its not a Mark mob where everyone can sling dirt. I'm not saying that that's what you're doing, I just want to make sure that prove your claims. As far as proof on Mark about contacting Tania husbands work, I now have proof he did it even when he told me he didn't. This contact was clearly to disrupt her husbands employment. And he did so from a UIA computer when hes on the job. Also there is proof that he knowingly had his name put on the PPA that Tania invented. I know you know way more than me about him and you have seen this proof I speak of. I'm just posting it so everyone knows I have seen proof before I accuse him. john
26 minutes ago
_________________________

john  Young

THE MARK REYLAND BBQ AT INVENTIONLAND Mark Reyland is the director of the UIA. Again once a scam is exposed, they delete the discussion, so I have to start it up all over !!

As many of you may know Ive been on another group the past few days trying to get to the bottom of the accusations against Mark Reyland.

The reason I call it THE MARK REYLAND BBQ AT INVENTIONLAND is because because I posted a comment saying I was on a fence, one side Mark Reyland and Roger Brown BBQing hamburgers and hot dogs in BBQ sauce stained t-shirts and on the other side is Derek Pater and Tania { the alleged victim } with music, steak and shrimp. And Invention land is where this accusation of a scam has taken place.

Mark posted something about an event that was coming up. This when Derek started commenting about Marks wrong doings and as director of the UIA that this was unacceptable behavior for someone that represents inventors and their interests. Derek showed all kinds of information about this. So I wanted to find out the truth, I asked Mark about these accusations on a comment, but instead of Mark responding, Roger Brown stepped up to bat for him. I questioned Roger about the emails that were submitted as proof of Marks wrong doings. Roger said neither one of us were there so we don't know what happened. Fair enough, but the emails said it all, I questioned him further asking , Based on the emails alone would you say that Mark had his name put on Tania's PPA without her knowledge, YES or NO. Again he dodged the question.

After some prodding by me for Mark to answer his own questions, he finally commented. Saying he would not discuss it on the Internet for all to see and to call him and he would answer any questions I had. I commented back OK but just so you know before hand its not going to remain private.

So I called him and left my # and the next day he called. We spoke for a wile, Mark explained everything in a very lengthy manner and I was believing him. But towards the end of the conversation he couldn't answer why his attorney put his name on another inventors PPA. In the emails from his attorney say that Mark told him to put his name on it. So I thought it could some how be miscommunication and let it ride. Then Mark told me that Derek's motive in this was to get free patent searches from one of Marks accusers in exchange for Derek posting about Mark. He said that Roger Brown had the emails to prove it. At this point I was very highly urinated at Derek and the others and was sure that I would soon see the email that proves it. So at the end of our conversation I apologise for my provoking comments and Mark then told me that Roger may not respond rite away because he had jury duty that day. So after the conversation I thought how would Mark know about Rogers jury duty unless they have been talking through all this.

After I emailed Roger and asked to see the emails between Derek and the other person agreeing to post for patent searches. Roger sent me a long list of emails between himself and Derek along with blogs about the accusations. I went through all of it and still couldn't find it. So I sent another email to Roger saying To send only the email pertaining to Derek and the other person . Wile I was waiting thinking that I'm going to see it I sent Mark a message saying that if this is true that I'm going to make Derek pay and might follow them around posting the email for all to see their true motive, for what they did to Mark and told him I believed him, thinking I'm soon to see this email Ive been waiting for.

During this time I get an email from Tania showing that Mark emailed her husbands work saying that she was being investigated by the FBI and RMCP for organized crime. I asked Mark about this in our conversation,asking did you call Tania's husbands work saying that she was being investigated. He said absolutely not, I guess I should have rephrased the question to did you call or email. Now this is proof that he is lying and has lied directly to me, now I'm leaning on Derek's side of the fence again.

See Mark BBQ Part 2