Sunday 27 May 2012

Inventor Roger Brown Looks like a FOOL Once AGAIN

John Young really Slapped  Mr Brown again.





Roger Brown • Actually John I was responding to your responses. I can't help you had trouble answering. And it was you who took it in another direction not me. That was your fault not mine. No, I am not a UIA Staff member. I have answered questions on licensing for them so have others that have experience in diferent fields. There are some patent attorneys that respond to those types of questions as they have time. I also am a moderator and contributer for Inventorspot.com,answer a number of questions here on Linkedin and a number of different blogs, I answer questions on a number of forums and write articles for blogs, Inventor's Digest magazine and do speaking engagements on inventing and licensing. I have never denied doing any of those. It is you and your buddies that try and make something sinister out of it.
Your turn Troy , are you doing the patent searches for John's company? Will you be listed on their ewebsite showing your credentials?


john YoungOK Roger,

I'm faking that email Huh, if you are saying that, I'm publicly calling you a liar. And will prove the email is real by forwarding it to anyone that wants to see proof that you are a LIAR and not to be trusted.

IF you are saying that I faked that email, you have just been caught in a lie to these inventors.

If anyone would like to see proof that Roger Brown is lying about being a UIA staff member, email me at tandjyoung@att.net and I will forwarded you the email as proof of my claims.

Also Roger stands beside the UIA and what these companies tried to do to the stick invention, All I had to do was sign the contract and pay,and I was riped off by UIA accredited medallion member companies. The same UIA that is supposed to be looking out for the inventors wanted to take my money for a stupid invention just as the other rip off companies did.

If these companies are going to sue me for what they did, that was totally unethical. You don't have to worry. Let me worry and you can answer the question.

THE question is, what do YOU think of what the UIA companies tried to do, they wanted to take money from an inventor with absolutely no chance of getting to market ?

Was it the correct think to do, yes or no?
Do you approve of them doing this , yes or no ?

If you don't answer this, then its obvious that you don't want to say how you feel about it, because it will go badly for them. Or you approve of what and how they did it and you could careless about the inventors and wont answer because you don't want them angry with you because you stand with them.

Answer it for all to see how you really feel and who you really are. Don't worry about a law suite because your answer wont be used in court, its an opinion and not relevant to any law suite, so don't use that as an excuse.

Get ready everyone the dancing clown show will now begin. Because he WILL NOT answer the question !

Then Gizmo turns Roger upside down with his Edible Sneakers concept. Roger ran like a scared pussy cat and never answered.
Troy RobisonRoger,
What exactly does your statement below mean?

"I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
A Civil Litigation,,,,really Roger. How could that be Mr Brown? Im sure you can re-site the American Inventors Protection Act word for word since you post it all over different forums and have wrote articles about Inventor Submission Companys. If you think the Company's that wanted to help John for MONEY have any recoarse against him it pretty much proves you dont understand the rules of the Protection Act.

Once the Company's sent John the contract to sign they need to give there success rate.....That wasnt done by any of them. Chris Hawker from Trident Design was the only one that stepped up to the plate and didnt throw a curve ball to the Inventor......

Hats off to Chris and his firm "Trident Design" !                   



Roger BrownAs I said before "I am not getting involved in that issue since it will most likely end up in civil litigation with you"
What is hard to understand about that? Is my answer the answer you want NO. Does it have to be the answer you want NO. I prefer to let the situation work its self out without my involvement. You may like spending your time in court, I have better things to do with my time. I do appreciate you giving my answering so much weight.




Troy RobisonRoger,You dont need to get involved with John's issue.

Lets look at it this way. If another Inventor invented an Edible Pair of Sneaker's out of Fruit RollUps and the lace eyelets dissolved in your mouth not the shoes or your hands and tasted like M&M'S ,Would it be ok for A,B,C or D, Inventor Submission Companys to tell the Inventor they have a good idea with their sneakers.Then they send the Inventor a contract to sign asking for money. Do they need to supply their success rate with the contract. Keep in mind once they send the contract their asking the inventor to sign a legal document.

At that point wouldnt the American Inventors Protection Act FEDERAL RULES kick in? Since you love to recite the act and rules this should be an easy question for you to answer. If your alittle rusty remembering how the act reads Google it then come back and answer.

Both of us know the Sneakers would never fly in retail and make the inventor any money. Dont We.......With that being said what are your thoughts?

Roger the info below was written by you roughly one yr ago........Do you have a change of Heart these days......

Look at what these companies are REQUIRED to share with you (IN WRITING) BEFORE you spend money with them. If they change the subject or try and not give you what is REQUIRED by LAW, WHY WOULD YOU USE THEM? It’s YOUR money you are wasting by not doing a little research.

The AIPA requires invention promoters (i.e., those who provide “invention promotion services”) to disclose a number of things in writing, prior to entering into a contract for invention promotion services. These are:
(1) the total number of inventions evaluated by the invention promoter for commercial potential in the past 5 years, as well as the number of those inventions that received positive evaluations, and the number of those inventions that received negative evaluations;
(2) the total number of customers who have contracted with the invention promoter in the past 5 years, not including customers who have purchased trade show services, research, advertising, or other nonmarketing services from the invention promoter, or who have defaulted in their payment to the invention promoter;
(3) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received a net financial profit as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter;
(4) the total number of customers known by the invention promoter to have received license agreements for their inventions as a direct result of the invention promotion services provided by such invention promoter; and
(5) the names and addresses of all previous invention promotion companies with which the invention promoter or its officers have collectively or individually been affiliated in the previous 10 years.

http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/giving-up-on-entrepeneurship
It would be a HUGE mistake for any one of the Inventor Submission Companys to take Legal action on John Young. If they do you can bet it will end up taking the UIA and Warren Tuttle down.
Were sure Roger Brown's creating damage for Edison Nation/Enventys Business Model now that he's on their team.

 inventorspotforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=4311&start=50Cached


http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Scammer-caught-his-pants-down-4272143.S.107404200

No comments:

Post a Comment