Of course, the only proof of stalking we've been shown, is of Mark Reyland being the stalker.
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2011/10/busted-again.html
Below he claims to work with the FBI and police in 3 countries. Again, are we surprised at his writing? No...he has nowhere to go but deeper into his life of lies. Look what happened when a lady spoke her opinion against Mark Reyland. It appears all people want from Reyland is proof of his claims. He can't provide them. Any authority he claims stalking to would ask the same proof to make sure there is no truth to what inventors are exposing him for. The only thing that is real is Mark Reyland not being who he claims and the UIA allowing someone who acts like a nutjob run their organization and slander inventors who do not follow him.
By the way: Why is he bringing up Tania again? We haven't seen anything written by her and she's not involved in the group on Linkedin. Our opinion? This is another show of his stalking issue with her. Is she safe to ever come online again?
http://markreylandemail.blogspot.com/2011/10/busted-again.html
Below he claims to work with the FBI and police in 3 countries. Again, are we surprised at his writing? No...he has nowhere to go but deeper into his life of lies. Look what happened when a lady spoke her opinion against Mark Reyland. It appears all people want from Reyland is proof of his claims. He can't provide them. Any authority he claims stalking to would ask the same proof to make sure there is no truth to what inventors are exposing him for. The only thing that is real is Mark Reyland not being who he claims and the UIA allowing someone who acts like a nutjob run their organization and slander inventors who do not follow him.
By the way: Why is he bringing up Tania again? We haven't seen anything written by her and she's not involved in the group on Linkedin. Our opinion? This is another show of his stalking issue with her. Is she safe to ever come online again?
JoAnne Leff • Mark...I have never worked with you or even spoken to you, but after your last post and a recent blog I read, I have to give my professional opinion to this debate. The following is a blog of yours that I found quite disturbing:http://inventoropinion.blogspot.com/2011/10/very-real-problem.htmlWhile you continually repeat your accusation of your being "stalked" by John Young (along with the others you have literally pictured in the blog above), it seems quite clear to me, at least, that he, along with the others, are not in any way involved in stalking behavior. John is simply unrelenting in his demand that you provide substance to certain claims that you've made in terms of specific accomplishments and is challenging you to a debate regarding Davidson. He may have more enthusiasm than polish, but his intention is clearly on the side of the inventor.
On the other hand, your intention seems self-serving only. You have levied charges against John and others of "cyber-stalking," and have posted pictures and names of these people who have, as John has, not stalked you, but have merely exercised their first amendment right to speak their minds and ask you as a professional in the field to substantiate your claims of accomplishment.
Instead of answering these questions, you have attempted to make these questioners into people committing inappropriate action when these are good people who simply want the truth of your professional claims and have found information to the contrary. Instead of addressing their concerns and questions, your blog, in particular, feels maliciously retaliatory and defensive in nature and your posts accuse rather than answer questions raised. Why don't you simply answer the specific questions posed of you?
People have the right in this country to investigate whatever and whomever they wish and to ask anyone, however zealously, to substantiate their professional claims without fear of inappropriate retaliation. Instead of answering their questions, your defensive and offensive posturing against those people questioning you should signal all inventors to stay away from you and any organization to which you are affiliated.
I am simply an observer and feel that all debates should be well meaning and for the benefit of inventors. I understand the sincerity of John's approach, albeit with rant, but your approach feels manipulative, worthy of a politician, with only polish and no substance.
I would hope that you would reconsider and take down that offensive and perhaps even slanderous blog. I would also hope that you would give those people, whom you have accused of stalking, a recant along with the answers to your claims regarding your accomplishments. Simply answer their questions once and for all concerned.
I do hope that we can put all of this behind us and resume working together with our considerable collective abilities and get back on track.
On the other hand, your intention seems self-serving only. You have levied charges against John and others of "cyber-stalking," and have posted pictures and names of these people who have, as John has, not stalked you, but have merely exercised their first amendment right to speak their minds and ask you as a professional in the field to substantiate your claims of accomplishment.
Instead of answering these questions, you have attempted to make these questioners into people committing inappropriate action when these are good people who simply want the truth of your professional claims and have found information to the contrary. Instead of addressing their concerns and questions, your blog, in particular, feels maliciously retaliatory and defensive in nature and your posts accuse rather than answer questions raised. Why don't you simply answer the specific questions posed of you?
People have the right in this country to investigate whatever and whomever they wish and to ask anyone, however zealously, to substantiate their professional claims without fear of inappropriate retaliation. Instead of answering their questions, your defensive and offensive posturing against those people questioning you should signal all inventors to stay away from you and any organization to which you are affiliated.
I am simply an observer and feel that all debates should be well meaning and for the benefit of inventors. I understand the sincerity of John's approach, albeit with rant, but your approach feels manipulative, worthy of a politician, with only polish and no substance.
I would hope that you would reconsider and take down that offensive and perhaps even slanderous blog. I would also hope that you would give those people, whom you have accused of stalking, a recant along with the answers to your claims regarding your accomplishments. Simply answer their questions once and for all concerned.
I do hope that we can put all of this behind us and resume working together with our considerable collective abilities and get back on track.
----------------------
Mark T. Reyland • JoAnne – although I respect your opinion and certainly your first amendment right to have one. You have no idea what you are talking about. These people are criminals, they are stalkers, and by indication of their behavior likely mentally ill.
I have been stalked by them for well over a year – under their own names and those of personalities they create in an effort to make it appear as more than one. I’m not stupid JoAnne. We have been working with law enforcement in several states and 3 countries, along with the FBI - make no mistake this is a very active criminal investigation.
We have documented every word they posted in all that time and although you get a good sense of their stalking by simply reading the posts the put up here, when you look at a stack of twelve solid inches of paper you get a much better idea of how big an issue this is. And that doesn’t even include the records being obtained from all the scam and blog companies they have hidden behind.
Maybe they can start posting your home address and phone number, pictures of your family, baseless accusations of everything from fraud to inappropriate behavior with a child. Or better yet JoAnne – they can send these lies in emails to YOUR children the same way they did mine.
When they turn on you the way they have several other people in this industry then you will understand what it feels like to have your family and your professional reputation drug through the mud by people who obviously need help.
Make no mistake JoAnne - John Young, Troy Robison, Tania Reyneart and Derek Pater are Stalkers – not just of me but others as well. Stay away from them and if they contact you here or any other place notify the police.
I have been stalked by them for well over a year – under their own names and those of personalities they create in an effort to make it appear as more than one. I’m not stupid JoAnne. We have been working with law enforcement in several states and 3 countries, along with the FBI - make no mistake this is a very active criminal investigation.
We have documented every word they posted in all that time and although you get a good sense of their stalking by simply reading the posts the put up here, when you look at a stack of twelve solid inches of paper you get a much better idea of how big an issue this is. And that doesn’t even include the records being obtained from all the scam and blog companies they have hidden behind.
Maybe they can start posting your home address and phone number, pictures of your family, baseless accusations of everything from fraud to inappropriate behavior with a child. Or better yet JoAnne – they can send these lies in emails to YOUR children the same way they did mine.
When they turn on you the way they have several other people in this industry then you will understand what it feels like to have your family and your professional reputation drug through the mud by people who obviously need help.
Make no mistake JoAnne - John Young, Troy Robison, Tania Reyneart and Derek Pater are Stalkers – not just of me but others as well. Stay away from them and if they contact you here or any other place notify the police.
Derek Pater • Mark,
We are exposing you plain and simple,http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/why-not-have-an-expert
We are exposing you plain and simple,http://www.edisonnation.com/forums/other/topics/why-not-have-an-expert
Derek Pater • http://inventorspotforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=30439#p30439
Re: Mark Reyland lied his way into the UIA
by Tania » Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:29 am
Tania
White Belt
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:27 pm
You might want to follow along with Linkedin on this topic. I was just sent this link. http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?vi ... pPCyBDZ4Y1
I have no desire to keep my account with this forum as I feel it has failed the inventor by allowing Mark to post his ridiculous claims. These are not claims made by the UIA as a whole, they are made by Mark personally and they are false.
Here is how Mark's family got wind of posts about him. He emailed a group of us a while back. Nobody contacted his family other than his own daughter's friend...
From: Mark Reyland <Mark@Creative3D.local>
Subject: EN
To: "Margaret" <lboments@gmail.com>, "Sally" <sally78@yahoo.com>, "Troy" <gizmo59@hotmail.com>, tania@taniareynt.com, "Ron" <rjlinnov@yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 7:20 AM
I wanted you all to know that I have left EN but not because of you. I’m leaving EN because of my family. I was struck pretty hard when my daughter called me crying and asked if I was okay. One of her friends had come across EN and sent her a link to these postings, she read much of what you all wrote, and it hurt her deeply - as it did my wife.
I have worked hard to help inventors, and in fact I have helped most of you. Taking my time and in many cases spending my own money to help people find a little success. Obviously you all feel I have wronged you in some way, and that’s ok. What I would ask you to do is take a moment and remember the ways I have helped you.
Please understand in the future when you wage war against someone publicly you hurt not only them, but the people who care about them.
Good luck to you all, and I wish you much success with your inventing.
Mark
It's rather difficult to report anyone to the authorities when you have already emailed people statements such as this.
I don't need to argue with Mark on forums or in private. I just wanted this last post in to show his previous claim.
Re: Mark Reyland lied his way into the UIA
by Tania » Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:29 am
Tania
White Belt
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:27 pm
You might want to follow along with Linkedin on this topic. I was just sent this link. http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?vi ... pPCyBDZ4Y1
I have no desire to keep my account with this forum as I feel it has failed the inventor by allowing Mark to post his ridiculous claims. These are not claims made by the UIA as a whole, they are made by Mark personally and they are false.
Here is how Mark's family got wind of posts about him. He emailed a group of us a while back. Nobody contacted his family other than his own daughter's friend...
From: Mark Reyland <Mark@Creative3D.local>
Subject: EN
To: "Margaret" <lboments@gmail.com>, "Sally" <sally78@yahoo.com>, "Troy" <gizmo59@hotmail.com>, tania@taniareynt.com, "Ron" <rjlinnov@yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 7:20 AM
I wanted you all to know that I have left EN but not because of you. I’m leaving EN because of my family. I was struck pretty hard when my daughter called me crying and asked if I was okay. One of her friends had come across EN and sent her a link to these postings, she read much of what you all wrote, and it hurt her deeply - as it did my wife.
I have worked hard to help inventors, and in fact I have helped most of you. Taking my time and in many cases spending my own money to help people find a little success. Obviously you all feel I have wronged you in some way, and that’s ok. What I would ask you to do is take a moment and remember the ways I have helped you.
Please understand in the future when you wage war against someone publicly you hurt not only them, but the people who care about them.
Good luck to you all, and I wish you much success with your inventing.
Mark
It's rather difficult to report anyone to the authorities when you have already emailed people statements such as this.
I don't need to argue with Mark on forums or in private. I just wanted this last post in to show his previous claim.
Derek Pater • its all therehttp://inventorsspot.blogspot.com/2011/10/mark-reyland-lied-his-way-into-uia.htmlFrom: Simon Brown
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:31 AM
To: realinventions@optusnet.com.au
Subject: UIAUK
Dear Mr Pater,
In respect of your recent comments regarding the United Innovation Association UK’s (UIAUK) alleged links to the United Inventors Association USA (UIAUSA) I wish to offer the following statement;
The UIAUK was formed in March 2011, and as we intended to use similar branding to the UIAUSA, a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) with the UIAUSA which allowed us to use such branding without any breach of Intellectual Property rights, was required.
The UIAUK and the UIAUSA do not have any formal or legal ties to each other, except for the above mentioned and are in no way related in any company formation, therefore your recent accusations regarding our being complicit with the UIAUSA or its Chief Executive, Mark Reyland, are unfounded and untrue.
However, in light of matters arising recently and new information received by the UIAUK we feel that we are no longer able to continue to bear any resemblance to the UIAUSA in name, branding or image and would like to make it clear that any association with the UIAUSA or Mark Reyland has ceased with immediate effect.
The UIAUK is, and always will be, a credible, honest and hardworking association supporting invention and innovation, new ideas and design and will not participate in any activities which might show us as being anything less than this.
Yours Sincerely
Simon Brown
Founder & CEO
UIAUK
Website: http://www.uiauk.org/
----------------------
Peter Dunn • Lol that is the most ridiculous load of rubbish that I've ever read. And yet again there still no offer of providing the proof that all of the people want to see. Instead of staying up late at night pounding away on your keyboard with steam coming out of your ears, typing out these pathetic threats of the FBI and the law enforcement agencies tracking people down, you could end it all right here right now.
There is only one person that is mentally ill here and it’s not any of the band of four. Johnny Gee was your alter ego yet you dare to call the kettle black. Just as Johnny Gee buckled under pressure and owned up to really being you, Mark Reyland, you can do the same here and produce the evidence that everyone is requesting.
There is only one person that is mentally ill here and it’s not any of the band of four. Johnny Gee was your alter ego yet you dare to call the kettle black. Just as Johnny Gee buckled under pressure and owned up to really being you, Mark Reyland, you can do the same here and produce the evidence that everyone is requesting.
----------------
As you can also see below, Derek is an accomplished inventor.
Derek Pater: Yes I request a Invention from Mark that is selling and has received a real award
from a 3rd Party, after all those stories Mark must have something worthy? right,
Because he is an Expert, this is what he claims?, that would require real experience correct?
My example below!,
http://www.designawards.com.au/application_detail.jsp?status=2&applicationID=10281
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JcjAIqCD9M
because if not, what is Mark doing in his position? as Director of the UIA USA
let alone all his other activities which fail the below Code of ethics
Mark its simple you do not measure up to what this industry expects,
http://www.uiausa.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=103731
FAIL!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln_omwmIEu4
As you can also see below, Derek is an accomplished inventor.
Derek Pater: Yes I request a Invention from Mark that is selling and has received a real award
from a 3rd Party, after all those stories Mark must have something worthy? right,
Because he is an Expert, this is what he claims?, that would require real experience correct?
My example below!,
http://www.designawards.com.au/application_detail.jsp?status=2&applicationID=10281
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JcjAIqCD9M
because if not, what is Mark doing in his position? as Director of the UIA USA
let alone all his other activities which fail the below Code of ethics
Mark its simple you do not measure up to what this industry expects,
http://www.uiausa.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=103731
FAIL!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln_omwmIEu4
No comments:
Post a Comment